We found that after deleting 250 million “lower” rows from a table with a monotonically increasing sequence, our MIN range scans were incredibly slow. Richard Foote describes this much more clearly than I can this morning, so all this post…
We found that after deleting 250 million “lower” rows from a table with a monotonically increasing sequence, our MIN range scans were incredibly slow. Richard Foote describes this much more clearly than I can this morning, so all this post…